AI for Coaching a Two-Student Restorative Conference Plan

End-of-lesson check

10 questions · take it digitally for instant feedback at tendril.neural-forge.io/learn/quiz/end-educators-ai-restorative-conference-prep-r13a5-adults

1. What is the main idea of "AI for Coaching a Two-Student Restorative Conference Plan"?

   1. AI helps teachers script the conference, but real repair happens in the room between students.
   2. Use AI as the final authority for the whole decision
   3. Avoid checking the answer once it sounds polished
   4. Focus only on speed instead of judgment

2. Which concept is most central to "AI for Coaching a Two-Student Restorative Conference Plan"?

   1. conflict
   2. restorative justice
   3. student voice
   4. repair

3. Which use of AI fits this topic best?

   1. Force a student to take accountability
   2. Let the AI decide what matters without your review
   3. Generate balanced opening questions for each student
   4. Use the answer before checking whether it fits the situation

4. Which limitation should you watch for in this topic?

   1. Generate balanced opening questions for each student
   2. Explain the topic in plain language
   3. Organize a draft for human review
   4. Force a student to take accountability

5. What should a careful learner remember about "Try this prompt"?

   1. Use AI to draft or organize ideas about restorative justice, then verify before acting.
   2. Skip the context so the tool can guess faster
   3. Treat the output as private even after sharing it online
   4. Use the answer without checking the source

6. You want to use AI after this lesson. What is the safest next step?

   1. Act immediately because the AI answer is written clearly
   2. AI cannot replace teacher judgment, student privacy duties, or school policy.
   3. Hide uncertainty so the final answer looks cleaner
   4. Use private or sensitive details before checking permission

7. How should AI output about restorative justice be treated?

   1. As proof that no other source is needed
   2. As a replacement for context, consent, or expert review
   3. As a draft or helper output that still needs human judgment and verification
   4. As something that becomes correct when it sounds confident

8. Name one way to verify an AI answer about restorative justice.

9. Which action would help you apply "AI for Coaching a Two-Student Restorative Conference Plan" responsibly?

   1. Replace your judgment on whether a conference is safe yet
   2. Use the tool to avoid thinking through the tradeoff
   3. Keep going even if the output conflicts with a trusted source
   4. Suggest pre-meeting individual prep prompts

10. Which choice is a bad use of AI for this lesson?

    1. Replace your judgment on whether a conference is safe yet
    2. Generate balanced opening questions for each student
    3. Ask for a plain-language explanation of conflict
    4. Compare the answer with a trusted source