Compare draft pre-registration against existing exemplars in the field
Generate the deviations log for inevitable post-hoc decisions
What AI cannot do
Substitute for substantive methodological thinking
Eliminate the discipline of actually following pre-registration
Replace peer review of pre-registration
Practice this safely
Use a real but low-risk workflow from your day. Treat AI as a drafting and organizing layer, then verify the output before anyone relies on it.
Ask AI to explain pre-registration in plain language, then underline anything that sounds uncertain or too broad.
Give it one detail from "AI for Pre-Registration Drafting and Compliance" and ask for two possible next steps plus one reason each step might be wrong.
Check OSF against a trusted source, teacher, adult, expert, or original document before you use it.
End-of-lesson check
15 questions · take it digitally for instant feedback at tendril.neural-forge.io/learn/quiz/end-research-AI-pre-registration-creators
What is the primary purpose of pre-registering a research study before data collection?
To prevent researchers from making analytic decisions after seeing results
To guarantee that findings will be statistically significant
To obtain funding approval from institutional review boards
To automatically publish results in academic journals
Which of the following is an explicit output when using AI to draft a pre-registration?
A dataset containing the study results
An automated email to ethics committee approval
A final peer-reviewed manuscript ready for submission
An AsPredicted or OSF-formatted pre-registration document
Which of these research decisions would typically be included in a pre-specified decisions checklist?
The conclusion the researcher wants the data to support
The final sample size after data collection is complete
The specific alpha level and exclusion criteria to apply
The names of co-authors who will review the paper
What is the purpose of a deviations log in the context of pre-registration?
To track participant recruitment timelines
To list funding sources that supported the research
To document any analytic decisions that differ from the original pre-registered plan
To record changes made to the pre-registration document after submission
A researcher uses AI to draft a pre-registration. What crucial limitation should they remember?
AI can substitute for the researcher's own methodological reasoning
AI cannot replace peer review of the pre-registration
AI eliminates the need for the researcher to follow their pre-registered plan
AI will guarantee their study receives ethics approval
How does pre-registration contribute to research transparency?
By ensuring all research questions are answered correctly
By eliminating the need for informed consent procedures
By automatically correcting statistical errors in submitted manuscripts
By making the planned analysis publicly visible before data collection
Which platforms were mentioned as examples where pre-registrations can be submitted?
TikTok and Instagram
PubMed and Google Scholar
AsPredicted and OSF
YouTube and Vimeo
Even with AI assistance in drafting a pre-registration, what must researchers still do themselves?
Request that AI make all final methodological decisions
Avoid documenting any deviations from the original plan
Submit the pre-registration without reviewing its accuracy
Follow the pre-registered plan when conducting analyses
What does the term researcher degrees of freedom refer to?
The number of participants required for statistical power
The physical workspace where researchers conduct experiments
The choices researchers can make about data analysis after seeing results
The methods used to select research assistants
What type of comparison can AI perform for a drafted pre-registration?
Comparison to the researcher's personal social media history
Comparison to unrelated commercial advertising campaigns
Comparison to existing pre-registration exemplars in the same field
Comparison to fictional study designs from novels
A researcher inputs their study design into an AI system. What should they expect the AI to produce?
A pre-registration draft and analysis script outline matching the plan
A published article ready for journal submission
A guarantee that the study will be replication
A complete statistical analysis with final results
What is included in the pre-specified decisions checklist that AI can generate?
Personal information about the research team
The specific p-value needed for publication
Alpha levels, exclusion criteria, and multiple comparisons corrections
The journal where results will be submitted
What does OSF stand for in the context of research transparency?
Open Science Framework
Operational Study Format
Original Scientific Findings
Online Statistical Forum
When researchers make post-hoc decisions that differ from their pre-registration, what should they do?
Only inform their close colleagues
Document them in a deviations log
Pretend the original plan was always followed
Hide these decisions to avoid criticism
What information must a researcher provide as input for AI to draft a pre-registration?
The final statistical results and conclusions
Research questions, hypotheses, methodology, and analysis plan