Loading lesson…
A coding agent should not be trusted because it sounds confident. CI is the boring machine that checks lint, types, tests, and build.
A coding agent should not be trusted because it sounds confident. CI is the boring machine that checks lint, types, tests, and build.
Add a CI workflow that runs lint, typecheck, tests, and build on every PR. Then ask the agent to fix failures without weakening the checks.Use this as the working prompt or checklist for the lesson.15 questions · take it digitally for instant feedback at tendril.neural-forge.io/learn/quiz/end-coder-ci-cd-agent-creators
Why should a coding agent's confident tone not be taken as a reliable indicator of correct code?
When setting up work for a coding agent, what should be identified first, before selecting which tool to use?
What is the recommended scope when assigning work to a coding agent?
How should you run and test the output produced by a coding agent?
Before sharing an AI agent's code contribution with a team, what three things should be inspected?
What role does CI play when a coding agent is integrated into a development workflow?
A team wants to get value from coding agents. What is the recommended approach for integrating them into existing workflows?
What question should you ask to determine what data an application should never expose?
What question identifies the rollback strategy if an AI agent's output causes problems in production?
According to the principles discussed, what proves that an AI agent's code change actually works?
Why is turning an AI demo into something 'observable' an important skill?
What makes code 'reversible' and why is this important when using AI agents?
What does it mean for AI-generated code to be 'safe enough for another person to use'?
The lesson mentions that AI can quickly create a working demo. What distinguishes a real developer skill from simply generating demos?
Which four automated checks are typically performed by a CI pipeline to validate code?