Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends

End-of-lesson check

15 questions · take it digitally for instant feedback at tendril.neural-forge.io/learn/quiz/end-research-agent-setups-creators

1. What is the core idea behind "Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends"?

   1. A tour of the research-agent tool landscape and how to pick the right one per task. The meta-skill: knowing which tool for which question.
   2. Add novelty language that wasn't in the source.
   3. Replace editorial judgment about field norms
   4. Replace the PRISMA-required dual independent screening

2. Which term best describes a foundational idea in "Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends"?

   1. Elicit
   2. Perplexity
   3. Consensus
   4. Semantic Scholar

3. A learner studying Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends would need to understand which concept?

   1. Perplexity
   2. Consensus
   3. Elicit
   4. Semantic Scholar

4. Which of these is directly relevant to Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends?

   1. Perplexity
   2. Elicit
   3. Semantic Scholar
   4. Consensus

5. Which of the following is a key point about Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends?

   1. Do you already have the source documents? → Claude Projects or NotebookLM
   2. Is this academic literature? → Elicit or Consensus, then Semantic Scholar to verify
   3. Is this current events or industry? → Perplexity or GPT Deep Research
   4. Is this a claim-level question (X causes Y?)? → Consensus or Scite

6. Which of these does NOT belong in a discussion of Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends?

   1. Is this current events or industry? → Perplexity or GPT Deep Research
   2. Do you already have the source documents? → Claude Projects or NotebookLM
   3. Add novelty language that wasn't in the source.
   4. Is this academic literature? → Elicit or Consensus, then Semantic Scholar to verify

7. What is the key insight about "The meta-skill" in the context of Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends?

   1. Add novelty language that wasn't in the source.
   2. Replace editorial judgment about field norms
   3. The biggest win in research-agent workflows is NOT mastering one tool — it's knowing which tool to reach for.
   4. Replace the PRISMA-required dual independent screening

8. What is the key insight about "Tool budgets add up" in the context of Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends?

   1. Add novelty language that wasn't in the source.
   2. Replace editorial judgment about field norms
   3. Replace the PRISMA-required dual independent screening
   4. Power users frequently spend $100-200/month across research tools.

9. What is the key warning about "Maintain methodological rigour" in the context of Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends?

   1. AI-assisted research requires transparent disclosure of tools used, validation of outputs against primary sources, and p…
   2. Add novelty language that wasn't in the source.
   3. Replace editorial judgment about field norms
   4. Replace the PRISMA-required dual independent screening

10. Which statement accurately describes an aspect of Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends?

    1. Add novelty language that wasn't in the source.
    2. The best workflows chain tools. Example: Elicit to map the literature → Consensus to validate specific claims → Semantic Scholar API to pull…
    3. Replace editorial judgment about field norms
    4. Replace the PRISMA-required dual independent screening

11. What does working with Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends typically involve?

    1. Add novelty language that wasn't in the source.
    2. Replace editorial judgment about field norms
    3. The big idea: no single research agent is good at everything. The researchers who get the most out of these tools are the ones who know exac…
    4. Replace the PRISMA-required dual independent screening

12. Which best describes the scope of "Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends"?

    1. It is unrelated to research workflows
    2. It applies only to the opposite beginner tier
    3. It was deprecated in 2024 and no longer relevant
    4. It focuses on A tour of the research-agent tool landscape and how to pick the right one per task. The meta-skill:

13. Which section heading best belongs in a lesson about Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends?

    1. The decision tree
    2. Add novelty language that wasn't in the source.
    3. Replace editorial judgment about field norms
    4. Replace the PRISMA-required dual independent screening

14. Which section heading best belongs in a lesson about Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends?

    1. Add novelty language that wasn't in the source.
    2. Stacking tools
    3. Replace editorial judgment about field norms
    4. Replace the PRISMA-required dual independent screening

15. Which of the following is a concept covered in Research Agent Setups: Perplexity, Elicit, Consensus, And Friends?

    1. Elicit
    2. Consensus
    3. Perplexity
    4. Semantic Scholar