Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test

When your search engine is an LLM, traditional source evaluation rubrics need an upgrade. Here's the creators-tier version.

9 min · Reviewed 2026

CRAAP was written before the synthetic web

The classic CRAAP test (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose) assumed a source was written by a human who could be held accountable. Today, much of the first page of any search is AI-generated content about AI-generated content. The rubric needs new axes.

The updated evaluation axes

Axis	Old question	New question
Authority	Who wrote it?	Who wrote it AND was any of it generated?
Currency	When was it published?	Has this post been auto-refreshed since it was cited?
Accuracy	Are the facts right?	Are the facts right AND independently verifiable?
Provenance	(not tracked)	Can I trace every claim to a primary source?
Incentives	What's the purpose?	Who profits if this is believed?

Adversarial sourcing

For any claim, deliberately search for the opposite view
Weight sources by their distance from the primary evidence, not their reputation
Ask: would this source change its story if the incentives reversed?
Read the methods section, not just the abstract

The big idea: in the LLM era, the axis that matters most is provenance. Every claim should trace to something a human could have disagreed with, measured, or witnessed.

End-of-lesson check

15 questions · take it digitally for instant feedback at tendril.neural-forge.io/learn/quiz/end-research-evaluating-sources-creators

What is the core idea behind "Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test"?
1. When your search engine is an LLM, traditional source evaluation rubrics need an upgrade. Here's the creators-tier version.
2. communication
3. Use AI to draft the participant payment rationale memo the IRB expects with the …
4. Perplexity is free and shows source links inline.
Which term best describes a foundational idea in "Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test"?
1. provenance
2. CRAAP
3. primary source
4. adversarial search
A learner studying Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test would need to understand which concept?
1. CRAAP
2. primary source
3. provenance
4. adversarial search
Which of these is directly relevant to Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test?
1. CRAAP
2. provenance
3. adversarial search
4. primary source
Which of the following is a key point about Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test?
1. For any claim, deliberately search for the opposite view
2. Weight sources by their distance from the primary evidence, not their reputation
3. Ask: would this source change its story if the incentives reversed?
4. Read the methods section, not just the abstract
Which of these does NOT belong in a discussion of Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test?
1. communication
2. For any claim, deliberately search for the opposite view
3. Weight sources by their distance from the primary evidence, not their reputation
4. Ask: would this source change its story if the incentives reversed?
What is the key insight about "The provenance question is new and critical" in the context of Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test?
1. communication
2. Use AI to draft the participant payment rationale memo the IRB expects with the …
3. 'Provenance' means: for any given claim, can you follow the citation chain back to a primary source (a dataset, an exper…
4. Perplexity is free and shows source links inline.
What is the key insight about "Reputation is not a shortcut" in the context of Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test?
1. communication
2. Use AI to draft the participant payment rationale memo the IRB expects with the …
3. Perplexity is free and shows source links inline.
4. Prestigious journals retract papers. Government agencies issue corrections.
What is the key insight about "Review date" in the context of Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test?
1. Reviewed in 2026. Treat fast-changing product names, prices, availability, and policy details as examples to verify befo…
2. communication
3. Use AI to draft the participant payment rationale memo the IRB expects with the …
4. Perplexity is free and shows source links inline.
Which statement accurately describes an aspect of Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test?
1. communication
2. The classic CRAAP test (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose) assumed a source was written by a human who could be held account…
3. Use AI to draft the participant payment rationale memo the IRB expects with the …
4. Perplexity is free and shows source links inline.
What does working with Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test typically involve?
1. communication
2. Use AI to draft the participant payment rationale memo the IRB expects with the …
3. The big idea: in the LLM era, the axis that matters most is provenance. Every claim should trace to something a human could have disagreed w…
4. Perplexity is free and shows source links inline.
Which best describes the scope of "Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test"?
1. It is unrelated to research workflows
2. It applies only to the opposite beginner tier
3. It was deprecated in 2024 and no longer relevant
4. It focuses on When your search engine is an LLM, traditional source evaluation rubrics need an upgrade. Here's the
Which section heading best belongs in a lesson about Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test?
1. The updated evaluation axes
2. communication
3. Use AI to draft the participant payment rationale memo the IRB expects with the …
4. Perplexity is free and shows source links inline.
Which section heading best belongs in a lesson about Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test?
1. communication
2. Adversarial sourcing
3. Use AI to draft the participant payment rationale memo the IRB expects with the …
4. Perplexity is free and shows source links inline.
Which of the following is a concept covered in Evaluating Sources: Beyond The CRAAP Test?
1. provenance
2. primary source
3. CRAAP
4. adversarial search

← Back to interactive lesson

Tendril · Creators · Research & Analysis