Reuse the static prefix of long prompts across calls.
11 min · Reviewed 2026
The premise
Long system prompts and few-shot examples are paid for again on every call unless you use prompt caching to reuse the prefix.
What AI does well here
Cache static prefix tokens across calls within a TTL.
Lower per-call latency on cached prefixes.
What AI cannot do
Cache content that changes per call.
Extend cache TTL beyond what the provider allows.
End-of-lesson check
15 questions · take it digitally for instant feedback at tendril.neural-forge.io/learn/quiz/end-tools-prompt-cache-r12a1-creators
A developer notices their AI application costs have doubled even though the total number of user requests stayed the same. What is the most likely reason?
The system prompt was shortened to reduce token count
The cache TTL is shorter than the average gap between user requests
The AI provider increased their per-token pricing
The application switched to a different model
In a prompt structured for caching, where should system instructions and few-shot examples be placed?
Only in the API system message field, not the user message
Mixed throughout the prompt in multiple sections
At the beginning, before any variable content
At the very end, after user input
A team wants to cache their prompt but the content includes user-specific data that changes with every request. What should they do?
Separate static instructions into a cacheable prefix, keep user data in the variable section
Cache the entire prompt including user data for faster processing
Request a longer TTL from the provider to accommodate the changes
Store user data in a database and reference it via ID in the prompt
What happens to latency when a cached prefix is reused on a subsequent API call?
Latency becomes zero for all cached requests
Latency increases because the cache must be looked up
Latency stays the same regardless of cache status
Latency decreases because prefix tokens don't need reprocessing
Which metric provides the clearest signal that prompt caching is actually working?
Average response time per request
Cache hit rate percentage
Total monthly API costs
Number of requests per day
A developer sets their cache TTL to 60 minutes but notices many cache misses during what should be active usage periods. What might explain this?
The model is too fast to need caching
The provider has a maximum TTL of 5 minutes
The static content was placed after the variable content
User requests are coming in bursts with gaps shorter than the TTL
What is required to enable prompt caching for a provider that supports it?
Paying for a premium API tier
Marking the static content block as cacheable in the API call
Upgrading to a larger model
Installing additional caching software
Why is monitoring total cost alone insufficient for evaluating prompt caching?
Costs are calculated differently for cached versus uncached requests
Costs fluctuate due to model version changes unrelated to caching
Costs don't distinguish between cache hits and misses—they only show the final bill
The provider randomly adds fees that don't correlate with caching
What limitation exists on cache duration that cannot be overridden by developers?
The provider sets a maximum TTL that cannot be exceeded
Developers can set any TTL they want up to 1 year
Cache duration is unlimited for paid accounts
Cache duration depends on the model size being used
What does the term "prefix" refer to in prompt caching?
The first word of every user message
The system message field in the API request
The static beginning portion of a prompt that gets cached
The variable content that changes between calls
If a developer wants to maximize cost savings from prompt caching, what should they avoid including in the cacheable prefix?
Company branding guidelines
Few-shot examples that demonstrate the desired output format
User-specific data that changes per request
System instructions that apply to all interactions
What occurs when the cache TTL expires between two requests that are otherwise identical?
The request is rejected as invalid
The provider automatically extends the TTL for repeated content
The cache is renewed automatically without any cost
The full prompt is reprocessed and charged at full price
A developer tests two prompts: one with caching enabled and one without, using identical system instructions and user input. What should they observe?
The cached version should have lower cost and latency on repeated calls
The uncached version should be faster because it doesn't check cache
There should be no difference in behavior between the two
Both prompts should cost exactly the same
What happens to uncached content in a prompt that contains both static and variable sections?
It causes the entire prompt to be rejected
It is processed normally and charged at the full rate
It is automatically added to the cache for next time
It is ignored by the API entirely
What is the relationship between prompt caching and API pricing models?
Cached requests are free regardless of content
Caching eliminates all per-token charges
Cached prefix tokens are charged once, variable tokens are charged per call
Caching changes the model from per-token to per-request pricing