Lesson 1234 of 1596
Agentic AI: building an eval harness before scaling the agent
A frozen set of input scenarios with graded outcomes is the only way to know if your agent got better or worse with each change.
Creators · Agentic AI · ~7 min read
The premise
Without an eval harness, every prompt change is a vibe-based decision. With one, you can measure whether a model swap or prompt edit actually improved success rate or just shifted which cases fail.
What AI does well here
- Run against a fixed scenario list when one is provided
- Output structured results that map to scenario IDs
- Be deterministic enough to score with temperature 0
What AI cannot do
- Generate the scenarios that matter to your business
- Decide what 'pass' means for an open-ended task
- Replace human judgment on subjective outputs
Key terms in this lesson
End-of-lesson quiz
Check what stuck
10 questions · Score saves to your progress.
Tutor
Curious about “Agentic AI: building an eval harness before scaling the agent”?
Ask anything about this lesson. I’ll answer using just what you’re reading — short, friendly, grounded.
Progress saved locally in this browser. Sign in to sync across devices.
Related lessons
Keep going
Creators · 11 min
Agent Evaluation Harnesses: Beyond Unit Tests for Multi-Step Behaviors
Agent behaviors emerge from multi-step interactions; unit tests on individual tools miss the failures that matter. Real evaluation requires task-completion harnesses with tracing and human review.
Creators · 48 min
Computer Use API: Letting AI Click Through GUIs
Computer Use lets Claude see your screen and use it — mouse, keyboard, apps. The capability is real, the gotchas are real. A hands-on look at what works in 2026.
Creators · 45 min
Browser Agents: Capabilities and Pitfalls
Browser agents — Operator, Atlas, Browser Use, MultiOn — are the most visible agent category. The capability is genuine, the failure modes are specific. Build with eyes open.
